Nevada Supreme Court Sides with Las Vegas Defense Group in Sex Assault Case
Last week the Nevada Supreme Court delivered an important advance opinion clarifying how courts should deliberate double jeopardy claims. This ruling stems from a district court case where the jury acquitted the defendant on lewdness with a minor but deadlocked on the related charge of the Nevada crime with sexual assault. Las Vegas Defense Group, which represents the defendant, persuaded the Nevada Supreme Court that the district court abused its discretion when deliberating whether the defendant was a victim of double jeopardy.
The Nevada crime of sexual assault (rape) occurs when someone has sexual penetration with someone else against his/her will or when he/she is too incapacitated to legally consent. The most common defenses to this crime are that the victim consented or that there's insufficient evidence to prove the rape charge. People suspected unwanted sexual touching that falls short of rape may instead be charged with the Nevada crime of open and gross lewdness.
Continue reading "Nevada Supreme Court Sides with Las Vegas Defense Group in Sex Assault Case" »








The Nevada crime of sexual assault (rape) is when someone commits sexual penetration with another against the victim's will or while the victim isn't able to freely consent (such as while being unconscious or drunk). Common defenses to rape include false allegations or that the victim did indeed consent. People accused of unlawfully touching someone sexually without penetration would instead be charged with open or gross lewdness.
Last week a twenty-four year old man was arrested for allegedly committing the