Law enforcement needs to obtain warrants prior to executing searches except in certain extraordinary situations, including emergencies. Recently, the Nevada Supreme Court adopted a new test to determine whether a warrantless search of a private residence is permissible.
Formerly, warrantless home entry by law enforcement was constitutional as long as two standards were met:
- the cops reasonably believed that emergency assistance was needed, and
- there was no intent to either search or arrest at the time of entry
But in the May 2009 Nevada Supreme Court case
Hannon v. State (125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 15), the Court announced they changed the test to conform with the 2006 United States Supreme Court case
Brigham City v. Stuart (547 U.S. 398, 404). Now, when deciding the reasonableness of an emergency home entry, the Court will consider only whether law enforcement “had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that there was an immediate need to protect the lives or safety of themselves or others.” Therefore, the cop’s subjective determination is no longer relevant.
In
Hannon, an officer arrived at a private residence after reports of a domestic disturbance. Even though the situation had cooled by the time the officer arrived, the officer entered the house without the residents’ permission and found evidence of marijuana use. An occupant, Mr. Hannon, was charged for
possession of a controlled substance in Nevada, and Mr. Hannon then moved to suppress the marijuana on the grounds that the officer’s search was unreasonable.
Continue reading "
NV Supreme Court Defines New Standard for Warrantless Entries
" »